Greetings.

On Mon, 2026-08-24 at 09:27 +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> 
> You don't need to clone the whole AUR either way, just the GitHub
> mirror [1]
> 
> [1] https://github.com/archlinux/aur


I have scanned all 19,934 AUR packages that declare install=. Static
rules only, no model involved.

7 packages remain flagged. 6 look like real concerns to me:

code-writer, codium-nautilus-git, home-assistant-hassio
curl/wget an upstream install.sh and pipe it to a shell at
build or install time

chaotic-aur-setup
pacman -U --noconfirm of a keyring straight from a CDN

surfshark-yac
the scriptlet writes /usr/lib/systemd/system/surfsharkd2.service onto
the live system

sysinfo-bin
the scriptlet runs pacman -S --needed git, i.e. pacman inside a pacman
transaction, for something that should be a depends()

None of these is malicious as far as I can tell — they are packages
handing control to a third party, or doing at install time what belongs
in the PKGBUILD. 

The seventh is a false positive of mine (a zero-width character in a
package's marketing text).

Nothing resembling the xsnow worm turned up anywhere else.

Tooling is at https://github.com/manticore-projects/aurscan (now
v0.8.3)  if anyone wants to reproduce or disagree with the rules.

Best and cheers,
Andreas

Reply via email to