Hi Robert,

It appears that Ivan Teese has been given a .89 handicap ( LS8-18 )
instead of .92 ( LS8 ) - this will affect the overall score
considerably, probably placing him 2nd outright - can you look into this
and amend, as a matter of history .

Thanks

Nigel



  

Nigel Andrews

Managing Director

RF Developments Pty Ltd

"A Queensland Company devoted to Research and Development in aviation
electronics" 

Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Web www.rf-developments.com

Ph: (61) 7 54635670 Fax: (61) 7 54635695

**************DISCLAIMER************

The information contained in the above e-mail message or messages (which
includes any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed. If you are not the addressee any form of disclosure, copying,
modification, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on
the information is unauthorised. If you received this communication in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
computer system network. 



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Hart
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 6:28 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Queensland Easter Comps etc


On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 10:29, Mike Borgelt wrote:

> If numbers and perceived handicapping shortcomings are a problem why 
> not split into two classes? Handicaps work best over a narrow range of

> performance.

True - but this is a fun comp and having a third class (we already have
two, with the club two seaters) increases the scorer workload and as
such I would oppose it. At the national club class, the same handicaps
are used as we used at Chinchilla ... and if we start splitting off the
18m and open class gliders, then we are getting into an FAI handicapped
multiclass comp (but without water as the Easter Comp is traditionally
dry).

WRT 'big wing' gliders, it's worth noting that a Nimbus 4 DM, Nimbus 2c
(not Alice), DG 500 and two Duo Discus gliders flew - but did _not_ win.
I think Bruce Taylor's win is more a case of a very good pilot, in good
form who is well suited to his aircraft, rather than simply a case of
poor handicapping or other big wing advantages.

At the CC nationals, I have heard people talking about borring a Libelle
rather than flying their 'big wing' in order to have a better chance of
winning - so it seems there are issues on both sides of the handicapping
fence!

-- 
Robert Hart                                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strategic IT & open source consulting                +61 (0)438 385 533
Brisbane, Australia                         http://www.interweft.com.au

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring



_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to