Peter,

In regard to your first critique, please have another CLOSE look at the 
information supplied. You will see that the drive motor is located directly 
between the two main wheels. On first inspection, this appears to be a very 
elegant solution.

Comments from the forum ???

Gary

 

From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net 
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Peter Champness
Sent: Monday, 20 April 2015 7:52 PM
To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Glow sailplane

 

I still like the single main wheel, preferably fixed. Simple, cheaper, robust 
and can't land wheel up.

 

Yes it is tipped over at the start of the take off, but wing can be raised as 
soon as airspeed is sufficient. which might not take long with the wheel motor.

 

Q4.  Is the tail wheel stuck on?  Seem s like this is a simulation at this 
stage.

 

Turbofan required instead of turbo jet.  Unfortunately nothing on the market 
yet.  

 

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Mike Borgelt <mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com> 
wrote:

At 07:24 PM 20/04/2015, you wrote:



Thanks Mike,

Q1.  Main wheels are very close together.  Would a wind tip it over?  Single 
main wheel and wing tip wheels might be better.  



Possibly, but single wheel means it is already tipped over. I've thought about 
2 single wheels a little further apart. More complex mechanism.





Q2. Where is the jet air intake?



Top of fuselage behind canopy. Pop up intake.






Q3.  Is the jet thrust sufficient for climb out?





Should be but I'd like a little more while preventing running the engine at 
more than 80% thrust for longevity and reliability reasons.

My rule of thumb is Thrust weight or around .18 to 0.2 so you can get 0.14 to 
0.15 T/W without running engine at 100%.

Mike









On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Mike Borgelt < mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com 
<mailto:mborg...@borgeltinstruments.com> > wrote:

VFMG members will have seen this already: http://www.proairsport.com/

Looks like PW-5 wings and tailplane, nicer fuselage and some really good ideas.

I've though for some time that dual wheels and electric taxiing are a great 
idea although I'd have made it a taildragger with steerable tailwheel.

Mike



Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
since 1978

www.borgeltinstruments.com <http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/> 


tel:Â Â  07 4635 5784Â Â Â Â Â overseas: int+61-7-4635 
<tel:%2B61-7-4635%205784>  5784

mob: 042835 5784Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â :Â  int+61-42835 5784

P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia 

_______________________________________________

Aus-soaring mailing list

Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net

To check or change subscription details, visit:

http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 

Borgelt Instruments - design & manufacture of quality soaring instrumentation 
since 1978
www.borgeltinstruments.com <http://www.borgeltinstruments.com/> 
tel:   07 4635 5784     overseas: int+61-7-4635 5784
mob: 042835 5784                 :  int+61-42835 5784
P O Box 4607, Toowoomba East, QLD 4350, Australia 


_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

 

_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to