Governments have the power to pass any bill they want, and they can waive around any sovereign rights they want as well.

It doesn't mean the bills will match reality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill


On 13/09/18 15:13, Paul Wilkins wrote:
Mark,
An enabler? I wish. The government is perfectly capable of passing the Assistance and Access Bill without my help.

There's a compelling argument that encryption doesn't negate the sovereign right of the Crown to conduct wiretap surveillance subject to judicial writ. I recognise the need to extend judicial writ to the cyber domain. So do plenty of other people, inside and outside of government, so it's happening, regardless of the objections of hardline privacy advocates.

I want this regime to be effective and implemented properly, with checks and balances consistent with a liberal democracy, and proportionate to the need for privacy. If I contribute to the process, it's to ensure a better outcome than had I stood idle and silent.

Kind regards

Paul Wilkins

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 12:58, Mark Smith <markzzzsm...@gmail.com <mailto:markzzzsm...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    You realise you're being an enabler don't you?

    On Thu., 13 Sep. 2018, 09:35 Paul Wilkins,
    <paulwilkins...@gmail.com <mailto:paulwilkins...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        If there were an equivalent to certificate transparency logs
        for our data retention laws and for these proposed technical
        assistance requests, you could be sure that they'd be used
        much more responsibly and sparingly.

        I like this idea, a lot.

        In my submission I raised the possibility of a single agency
        acting as a clearing house for judicial writs, and issuing per
        warrant SSL certificates to secure warrant data as part of the
        process. The idea to have them implement certificate
        transparency is excellent, and I'd support any representation
        to government urging them to resource such efforts. However,
        it's going to be a struggle, given where, if you've noticed,
        gov.au is not yet DNSSEC signed - which I find deliciously
        ironic, the government issuing itself new powers to protect
        our cyber security, while their whole TLD flaps in the breeze...

        Kind regards

        Paul Wilkins


        On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 21:52, Paul Gear
        <aus...@libertysys.com.au <mailto:aus...@libertysys.com.au>>
        wrote:

            On 12/09/18 17:04, Mark Newton wrote:
            > ...
            > There is no democratic brake on the advancement of the
            intelligence
            > community’s powers, they continue to do whatever the
            hell they want,
            > with no recourse.
            > ...

            ^ This.  Those in power continue to wield it in ways which
            benefit
            themselves rather than all of us.  I'm not sure what the
            entire solution
            is, but part of it surely must include being open to
            scrutiny by the
            general public.  If there were an equivalent to
            certificate transparency
            logs for our data retention laws and for these proposed
            technical
            assistance requests, you could be sure that they'd be used
            much more
            responsibly and sparingly.

            I would also add that nor is there a brake on the
            advancement of Silicon
            Valley's powers.  Imagine if the same public (or
            near-public) scrutiny
            were available for the decisions that large Internet,
            financial, and
            advertising firms make about us...

            Paul

            _______________________________________________
            AusNOG mailing list
            AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net>
            http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

        _______________________________________________
        AusNOG mailing list
        AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net>
        http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog



_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

--
Nick Stallman
TECNICAL DIRECTOR
Email   n...@agentpoint.com <mailto:n...@agentpoint.com>
Website         www.agentpoint.com.au <https://www.agentpoint.com.au/>

Agentpoint <https://www.agentpoint.com.au/> Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/Agentpoint/> Twitter <https://twitter.com/agentpoint> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/agentpoint/>

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

Reply via email to