What needs to be further discussed? How is there any ambiguity?

This harassment is wrong regardless of when and where it occurs.


On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 13:05, Robert Hudson <hud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I tend to agree with Paul - if the list charter means we can't discuss a 
> bloody serious issue about how some of our community behave (and the fact 
> that this behaviour is inappropriate), then I don't think I want to be on 
> this list any more.
>
> Sweep this sort of thing under the carpet (and make no mistake, that's 
> EXACTLY what the "STOP THREAD" was doing), and you're just enabling it to 
> continue.
>
> If such behaviour was reported within the ITPA membership and the accusation 
> was found to be true, the perpetrator would be excluded from the 
> organisation. Period.
>
> I guess we find ourselves at a point where we find out what sort of group 
> AusNOG wants to be.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 10:07, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Where large chunks of our lives are winding up on line, I find it 
>> problematic where discussion of endemic problems get ruled outside the terms 
>> of service. It leaves the problem to fester. Discussion should be legitimate 
>> where there's no names, so no libel.
>>
>> Also, the police will only involve themselves in instances of criminal 
>> behaviour. Most inappropriate workplace behaviour falls short and they won't 
>> be interested.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Paul Wilkins
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 12:46, David Hughes <da...@hughes.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Bevan,
>>>
>>> Any allegation of sexual harassment is a very serious matter and I 
>>> encourage you to raise these issues with the appropriate authorities.  The 
>>> police are in the best position to deal with such allegations.   If I can 
>>> be of any assistance please don’t hesitate to contact me directly, off-list.
>>>
>>>
>>> To the members of the list - I’m sure any of you would agree that any form 
>>> of sexual harassment is not acceptable.   As such, there is no reason for 
>>> you to follow-up to Bevan’s post.  There is nothing to debate here.  Please 
>>> note that this is a STOP THREAD post.  Please see the list charter below if 
>>> you do not understand your obligations with relation to a STOP THREAD.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.ausnog.net/mailing_list/charter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David
>>> ...
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

Reply via email to