Very scary section (4) The eSafety Commissioner is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness in relation to the issue of a 3 notice under subsection (1).
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 11:22, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/s1201_first-senate/toc_pdf/1908121.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf > > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 10:57, Simon Sharwood <si...@jargonmaster.com> > wrote: > >> So I was in a thing yesterday with a very senior government relations >> person from one of the top 3 clouds. And they'd been advised the >> legislation had very vague wording, meant that they and all cloud services >> had potential liability. >> >> At least one other major cloud's lobbyists had the same advice. Both >> tried to alert the government to the fact they'd cast the net far wider >> than anticipated. >> >> >> So some hurried back-channel efforts were made to change the wording of >> the legislation to be more specific about social media. >> >> Those changes weren't made and this government relations pro was >> flabbergasted at the haste and lack of consultation. >> >> He said it just makes it easier for people to fling FUD at the whole >> local industry. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Narelle Clark <narel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Just to clarify - it was introduced to the Senate and approved last >>> night. It will hit the House of Reps today. >>> >>> And the PJCIS hasn't even seen it. >>> >>> This is flawed in so many ways, and it will affect our industry >>> massively. >>> >>> Why should anyone build a content related business here? How do we >>> protect staff and customers from malicious posting in order to invoke this >>> legislation? >>> >>> Narelle >>> >>> On Thu, 4 Apr. 2019, 10:43 am Narelle Clark, <narel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Parliament has just rushed through more impractical legislation to jail >>>> executives of content providers (that would be all of us) if vile content >>>> is not removed "expeditiously". >>>> >>>> Here is some reaction to it... >>>> >>>> Overview: >>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2019-04-04/facebook-youtube-social-media-laws-rushed-and-flawed-critics-say/10965812 >>>> >>>> Law Council: >>>> https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/am/start-ups-concerned-about-new-social-media-laws/10969282 >>>> >>>> >>>> Scott Farquar: >>>> https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/rushed-social-media-legislation-is-seriously-flawed/10969482 >>>> >>>> >>>> Narelle >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> AusNOG mailing list >>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >>> >> >> >> -- >> Simon Sharwood | JargonMaster Corporate Communications | >> M +61 (0)414 37 37 26 | >> E si...@jargonmaster.com | W www.jargonmaster.com >> 24 North Street Marrickville NSW 2204 AUSTRALIA >> ABN: 14743763968 >> Work blog: jargonmaster.wordpress.com >> Free/Busy details: http://www.jargonmaster.com/calendar/ >> I'm a member of DHBC.org.au and a vExpert >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog