Err - since when have we not wanted to divert traffic across lower cost networks?
Geeze I remember being sternly told by a certain Geoff H in the early 90s that we couldn't make our international links too cheap as "PEOPLE WILL PUT VOICE ON IT!!" Exactly. What's good for the goose... N On Tue, 15 Oct. 2019, 5:09 pm Paul Wilkins, <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well that is interesting Narelle, however, if it's anticompetitive to > discriminately treat packet based VOIP traffic, then it is likewise > anticompetetive to cross subsidise your circuit based business by shunting > traffic over a competitors' packet based network. What's sauce for the > goose etc. > > Kind regards > > Paul Wilkins > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 14:45, Narelle Clark <narel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 10:14, <m...@ozonline.com.au> wrote: >> > >> > Also, anyone have any thoughts about what ACL one might put in place >> > to block wifi calling if one was of a mind to? >> >> The last time I had a conversation with the Chair of the ACCC about >> deliberately degraded (poor or no performance of) VoIP on other >> networks, he wasn't impressed... >> >> The phrase anti-competitive behaviour was used... an eyebrow was raised... >> >> People do notice when SIP, RTP etc stop working on networks, so it >> really isn't a good idea. >> >> That applies to the big players as much as it does to the smaller >> ones, btw. If you want to release a new product or service, surely you >> *want* to reach their customers too? And you want your customers >> happy? >> >> -- >> >> >> Narelle Clark >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
