On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:55 PM Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: > > bufferbloat is rarely fatal
This task will put me in my grave, sooner rather than later! > > > LOL! I know one person taht may disagree with that :) > > -mel > > On Dec 1, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Tom Mitchell <tmitch...@netelastic.com> wrote: > > > Not sure we need the FCC telling us how to build products or run networks. > Seat belts are life-or-death, but bufferbloat is rarely fatal ;-) Let it be > a point of differentiation. > > -- Tom > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:56 PM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Over here: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ADByjakzQXCj9Re_pUvrb5Qe5OK-QmhlYRLMBY4vH4/edit >> >> Us bufferbloat folk have been putting together a response to the FCC's >> NOI (notice of inquiry) asking for feedback as to increasing the >> broadband speeds beyond 100/20 Mbit. >> >> "Calls for further bandwidth increases are analogous to calling for >> cars to have top speeds of 100, 200, or 500 miles per hour. Without >> calling also for better airbags, bumpers, brakes, or steering wheels, >> (or roads designed to minimize travel delay), these initiatives will >> fail (and are failing) to meet the needs of present and future users >> of the internet." >> >> Comments (and cites) welcomed also! The text is still somewhat in flux... >> >> >> -- >> :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab >> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos -- :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
