Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:48:29 +0100 From: Geoff Clare <g...@opengroup.org> Message-ID: <20180810154829.GA26874@lt2.masqnet>
| Wouldn't simply changing | "multiple fields" to "multiple fields or no fields" solve it? I am sure there are many ways it could be solved. That is one, if we are willing to risk someone interpreting that as allowing pathname expansion to also produce no fields. | I'm afraid I won't be able to contribute to this discussion further, | as I'll be finishing for the day soon and I'm away for a week from | tomorrow. No problem. It looks like this issue might be skipped next week anyway, in which case I need go look further ahead to what might replace it, just in case. kre