Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:48:29 +0100
From: Geoff Clare <g...@opengroup.org>
Message-ID: <20180810154829.GA26874@lt2.masqnet>
| Wouldn't simply changing
| "multiple fields" to "multiple fields or no fields" solve it?
I am sure there are many ways it could be solved. That is one,
if we are willing to risk someone interpreting that as allowing
pathname expansion to also produce no fields.
| I'm afraid I won't be able to contribute to this discussion further,
| as I'll be finishing for the day soon and I'm away for a week from
| tomorrow.
No problem. It looks like this issue might be skipped next week
anyway, in which case I need go look further ahead to what might
replace it, just in case.
kre
