Robert Elz wrote, on 10 Sep 2020: > ... a hugely long email that I have neither the time nor the energy to reply to point by point. Most of it constitutes an attempt to reverse a decision that has already been made in a teleconference - that we will standardise sig2str() and str2sig() as implemented in Solaris and other SVR4 derivatives. I can't see the ORs changing their minds on this.
There was one part concerning an editorial matter which I will respond to ... >> That is exactly what I was trying to do. The table has no table number, so >> the only way to refer to it is by some descriptive means. > > That's fine, but the one obvious way to descriptively refer to a list in a > table would be to use the word "table" somewhere in that description, wouldn't > it? Good point. I will change it to include the word "table". > It turns out that there is just one table in <signal.h> (in XBD) There are three, actually. The other two are near the end of the DESCRIPTION section. -- Geoff Clare <g.cl...@opengroup.org> The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England
