A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                calestyo
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Issue 8 drafts
Issue ID:                   1771
Category:                   Shell and Utilities
Type:                       Enhancement Request
Severity:                   Editorial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     Resolved
Name:                       Christoph Anton Mitterer 
Organization:                
User Reference:              
Section:                    Utilities / printf 
Page Number:                3269 
Line Number:                111019 
Final Accepted Text:        See
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771#c6439. 
Resolution:                 Accepted As Marked
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2023-08-07 19:22 UTC
Last Modified:              2023-09-01 18:37 UTC
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    support or reserve %q as printf-utility format
specifier
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0001774 Support ' <apostrophe> as a forma...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0006451) kre (reporter) - 2023-09-01 18:37
 https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771#c6451 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Re https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771#c6445 -- I understand the
desire to indicate what should be used
as an alternative to anything being phased out, that's a good thing.

But that's only when the alternative actually works for the purpose, and
here
it simply doesn't.

Perhaps a better question might be why we'd even consider deprecating
any functionality, which is all of: widely supported, used by
applications,
and has no current standard alternative.   Surely the proper procedure in
that case is to specify something that can be used as the alternative
first,
and deprecate once that is available.

It isn't as if there's any urgent need for %b in printf(1) to ever act
like %b in printf(3) - even after the latter actually exists. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       New Issue                                    
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Name                      => Christoph Anton
Mitterer
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Section                   => Utilities / printf
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Page Number               => 3269            
2023-08-07 19:22 calestyo       Line Number               => 111019          
2023-08-07 19:36 chet_ramey     Note Added: 0006416                          
2023-08-07 19:46 calestyo       Note Added: 0006417                          
2023-08-07 23:39 salewski       Issue Monitored: salewski                    
2023-08-08 08:46 geoffclare     Note Added: 0006418                          
2023-08-08 14:28 calestyo       Note Added: 0006420                          
2023-08-08 15:04 geoffclare     Note Added: 0006421                          
2023-08-08 17:10 calestyo       Note Added: 0006422                          
2023-08-08 18:45 eblake         Note Added: 0006423                          
2023-08-08 20:40 jsm28          Note Added: 0006424                          
2023-08-08 20:53 calestyo       Note Added: 0006425                          
2023-08-31 16:10 Don Cragun     Note Added: 0006439                          
2023-08-31 16:13 Don Cragun     Final Accepted Text       => See
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1771#c6439.
2023-08-31 16:13 Don Cragun     Status                   New => Resolved     
2023-08-31 16:13 Don Cragun     Resolution               Open => Accepted As
Marked
2023-08-31 16:14 Don Cragun     Tag Attached: issue8                         
2023-08-31 17:46 eblake         Relationship added       related to 0001774  
2023-08-31 17:48 eblake         Note Added: 0006440                          
2023-08-31 17:49 eblake         Note Edited: 0006440                         
2023-08-31 18:33 eblake         Note Added: 0006441                          
2023-08-31 22:00 eblake         Note Added: 0006442                          
2023-09-01 01:23 kre            Note Added: 0006443                          
2023-09-01 01:40 kre            Note Added: 0006444                          
2023-09-01 01:43 kre            Note Edited: 0006443                         
2023-09-01 08:40 geoffclare     Note Added: 0006445                          
2023-09-01 12:00 eblake         Note Added: 0006446                          
2023-09-01 12:03 eblake         Note Edited: 0006446                         
2023-09-01 12:29 stephane       Note Added: 0006447                          
2023-09-01 12:30 stephane       Note Edited: 0006447                         
2023-09-01 12:32 stephane       Note Edited: 0006447                         
2023-09-01 14:00 geoffclare     Note Added: 0006448                          
2023-09-01 14:17 chet_ramey     Note Added: 0006449                          
2023-09-01 17:55 stephane       Note Added: 0006450                          
2023-09-01 18:37 kre            Note Added: 0006451                          
======================================================================


  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • Re: [Is... Robert Elz via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • Re:... Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • ... Chet Ramey via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
  • [Issue 8 dra... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to