> On 14 Jan 2025, at 00:29, Brian Inglis via austin-group-l at The Open Group 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> MW Collegiate has both implementer and implementor with no distinction.
> OED has implementer with implementor as variant.
> Oxford Reference says:
> Although the variant spelling implementor predominated for much of the late 
> 20th century, today implementer is considered standard. Current ratio: 4:1.
> It appears there is little difference between American and British English 
> where implementer is equally common.

In the n-gram search below, “implementor” has a peak 1990, but is now down 
below the 1962 level, whereas “implementer” has a rapid increase since 1996, 
and is contemporary more than 10 times more common.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=implementor%2Cimplementer&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3



  • [1003.1(2024... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
    • [1003.1... Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
      • [10... Brian Inglis via austin-group-l at The Open Group
        • ... Hans Åberg via austin-group-l at The Open Group

Reply via email to