Hi Sarah, all, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Sarah Tarrant <[email protected]> > Envoyé : lundi 22 septembre 2025 22:48 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; rfc-editor@rfc- > editor.org; [email protected] > Objet : Document intake questions about <draft-ietf-opsawg-secure- > tacacs-yang-13> > > Author(s), > > Congratulations, your document has been successfully added to the > RFC Editor queue! > The team at the RFC Production Center (RPC) is looking forward to > working with you as your document moves forward toward > publication. To help reduce processing time and improve editing > accuracy, please respond to the questions below. Please confer > with your coauthors (or authors of other documents if your > document is in a > cluster) as necessary prior to taking action in order to > streamline communication. > If your document has multiple authors, only one author needs to > reply to this message. > > As you read through the rest of this email: > > * If you need/want to make updates to your document, we encourage > you to make those changes and resubmit to the Datatracker. This > allows for the easy creation of diffs, which facilitates review by > interested parties (e.g., authors, ADs, doc shepherds). > * If you feel no updates to the document are necessary, please > reply with any applicable rationale/comments. > > > Please note that the RPC team will not work on your document until > we hear from you (that is, your document will remain in AUTH state > until we receive a reply). Even if you don't have guidance or > don't feel that you need to make any updates to the document, you > need to let us know. After we hear from you, your document will > start moving through the queue. You will be able to review and > approve our updates during AUTH48. > > Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have at > [email protected]. > > Thank you! > The RPC Team > > -- > > 1) As there may have been multiple updates made to the document > during Last Call, please review the current version of the > document: > > * Is the text in the Abstract is still accurate? > * Are the References, Authors' Addresses, Contributors, and > Acknowledgments sections current? > > [Med] All is OK. > 2) Please share any style information that could help us with > editing your > document. For example: > > * Is your document's format or its terminology based on another > document? > If so, please provide a pointer to that document (e.g., this > document's > terminology should match DNS terminology in RFC 9499). > * Is there a pattern of capitalization or formatting of terms? > (e.g., field names > should have initial capitalization; parameter names should be in > double quotes; > <tt/> should be used for token names; etc.) [Med] Terms are used following the conventions in the parent documents, cited in Section 2. > > > 3) Is there any text that should be handled extra cautiously? For > example, are > there any sections that were contentious when the document was > drafted? > [Med] Nothing special to call out here. > > 4) Is there anything else that the RPC should be aware of while > editing this > document? > > > 5) This document contains sourcecode: > > * Does the sourcecode validate? [Med] Both yang and examples were validated. > * Some sourcecode types (e.g., YANG) require certain references > and/or text > in the Security Considerations section. Is this information > correct? [Med] Yes > * Is the sourcecode type indicated in the XML? (see information > about > sourcecode types). [Med] We tagged the YANG module with "yang" type and the examples as "json". > * Is there any artwork that should be formatted as artwork? > > > 6) This document is part of Cluster 555. > > * To help the reader understand the content of the cluster, is > there a > document in the cluster that should be read first? Next? If so, > please provide > the order and we will provide RFC numbers for the documents > accordingly. [Med] draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13 should be read first then this one. > If order is not important, please let us know. > * Is there any text that has been repeated within the cluster > document that > should be edited in the same way? For instance, parallel > introductory text or > Security Considerations. [Med] No. Thanks. > > > > On Sep 22, 2025, at 3:42 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Author(s), > > > > Your document draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-13, which has > been approved for publication as > > an RFC, has been added to the RFC Editor queue > > > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fwww.rfc- > editor.org%2Fcurrent_queue.php&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40 > orange.com%7C4f761a3b5b9744706d2108ddfa1951bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638941708844652016%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3 > d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO > IjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HYM2OXJa7v9Xe7fS0c > gdGmXLhE2hSY2xIUVOnn0xUUk%3D&reserved=0>. > > > > If your XML file was submitted using the I-D submission tool > > > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fsubmit%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair > %40orange.com%7C4f761a3b5b9744706d2108ddfa1951bf%7C90c7a20af34b40b > fbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638941708844672461%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ > sb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsI > kFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Z7F%2BRGMegZm1n > Bp4nvs1B%2FUrQRRErm2SpMgOZSJYnDY%3D&reserved=0>, we have already > retrieved it > > and have started working on it. > > > > If you did not submit the file via the I-D submission tool, or > > if you have an updated version (e.g., updated contact > information), > > please send us the file at this time by attaching it > > in your reply to this message and specifying any differences > > between the approved I-D and the file that you are providing. > > > > You will receive a separate message from us asking for style > input. > > Please respond to that message. When we have received your > response, > > your document will then move through the queue. The first step > that > > we take as your document moves through the queue is converting > it to > > RFCXML (if it is not already in RFCXML) and applying the > formatting > > steps listed at > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fpubprocess%2Fhow-we- > update%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C4f761a3b > 5b9744706d2108ddfa1951bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C > 0%7C638941708844691752%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR > ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyf > Q%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=gl9PL764XD%2F043yDydwiNuMWGk6rp8sn%2Bzq > JBZRdmg4%3D&reserved=0>. > > Next, we will edit for clarity and apply the style guide > > > (<https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% > 2Fwww.rfc- > editor.org%2Fstyleguide%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40oran > ge.com%7C4f761a3b5b9744706d2108ddfa1951bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9 > 253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638941708844707803%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey > JFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoi > TWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LtwJ3LKhDHQDETV1RI8Tqr > LAoBQPDsq1nyZdnqpkgx0%3D&reserved=0>). > > > > You can check the status of your document at > > > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fwww.rfc- > editor.org%2Fcurrent_queue.php&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40 > orange.com%7C4f761a3b5b9744706d2108ddfa1951bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc > 48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638941708844721026%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3 > d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFO > IjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0w7cP4JP%2BcdS5vrd > b3f73SVhGKQ7dH9UcjjsR1YqiSc%3D&reserved=0>. > > > > You will receive automatic notifications as your document > changes > > queue state (for more information about these states, please see > > > <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2 > Fwww.rfc- > editor.org%2Fabout%2Fqueue%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o > range.com%7C4f761a3b5b9744706d2108ddfa1951bf%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4 > 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638941708844734033%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d > 8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI > joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=a9orWCGVNl5rje69W%2 > B5mqmNZRfko2WgBuI0UwaWGhxo%3D&reserved=0>). When we have completed > > our edits, we will move your document to AUTH48 state and ask > you > > to perform a final review of the document. > > > > Please let us know if you have any questions. > > > > Thank you. > > > > The RFC Editor Team > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
