Hi David and Michael,

Thank you both for your confirmation! We have updated the relevant text and 
removed RFC 9811 as an informative reference. Please see mail from 11 December 
for followup comments/questions that require your attention. We will wait to 
hear back from you.

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908.txt
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908.pdf
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908.html
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908.xml

Diff files:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908-auth48diff.html (diff showing 
AUTH48 changes only)
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9908-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)

AUTH48 status page:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9908

Thank you!
Madison Church
RFC Production Center

> On Dec 15, 2025, at 12:30 PM, David von Oheimb <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 15.12.25 18:31, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Madison Church <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Thank you for your response! To clarify, should the document only
>> > reference RFC 9810 instead of both RFCs? If yes, we will remove RFC
>> > 9811 from the Informative References section (and from the updated text
>> > below).
>> 
>> Yes, I think with the split in the (CMP) documents, that only 9810 need be 
>> referenced.
> Correct.
> 
> @Madison, as I tried to explain on Dec 11, the document should not reference 
> RFC 9811 because it is only about HTTP transfer of CMP messages, which is not 
> relevant at that point.
> We should reference in this paragraph only RFCs 9810, 9483, and 4211. As 
> written, my concrete suggestion for adapting the paragraph is: A similar 
> method has been defined in "Internet X.509 Public Key
> Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)" [RFC9810]
> and the "Lightweight Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Profile"
> ([RFC9483], Section 4.3.3) using a CSR template as defined for CRMF [RFC4211].
> David 
> 

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to