Hi Jürgen, Thank you for pointing out that sentence in the Introduction. Your suggestion is a good one; I made the update (see files below). I also checked the YANG modules using pyang with the --ietf flag, and they are still valid. Note that these will also be double-checked by the RPC team immediately before publication.
We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9911). We now consider AUTH48 to be complete and will begin to prepare this document for publication. Thank you for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process! --FILES (please refresh)-- Updated XML file: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911.xml Updated output files: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911.html Diff files showing only the last round of AUTH48 changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) Diff files showing all changes made during AUTH48: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) Diff files showing all changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911-rfcdiff.html (side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9911-alt-diff.html (diff showing changes where text is moved or deleted) For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9911 Thank you, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Dec 17, 2025, at 4:50 AM, Jürgen Schönwälder > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 02:30:24PM -0800, Rebecca VanRheenen wrote: >> >> Hi Jürgen, >> >> Thank you for the reply. We have updated the document accordingly. >> >> All of our questions have now been addressed. Please review the document and >> let us know if any further changes are needed or if you approve the document >> in its current form. >> > > Hi Rebecca, > > this looks all good, I went through all the diffs once more. Just a > minor question (from a non-native speaker): The introduction now > reads: > > * The "ietf-inet-types" module defines data types relevant for the > Internet Protocol suite such as types related to IP address, types > for domain name, host name, URI, and email, and types for values > in common protocol fields (e.g., port numbers). > > Is it really 'IP address' or should it be "IP addresses' since there > are different kinds of IP addresses? For me, the singular 'IP address' > reads a bit strange but I leave it to your judgement. > > Do you double check that the YANG is still valid? I have not verified > this using tools myself. > > /js > > -- > Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
