Dear co-authors, RFC editors, et al.,
very pleased that everything is settled now, just before the holiday break.
Thanks a lot for your efforts!
Merry Christmas to all.
David
On 23.12.25 21:20, Madison Church wrote:
Authors,
Michael and David - Thank you for the confirmation!
Now that we have all necessary approvals, we will move this document forward in
the publication process. Thank you all for your time and efforts during AUTH48!
Best,
Madison Church
RFC Production Center
On Dec 23, 2025, at 2:10 PM, Michael Richardson<[email protected]> wrote:
Madison Church<[email protected]> wrote:
Per internal discussion with RPAT, we have added "base64" to the list
of sourcecode types. Thus, we have left the sourcecode types as is in
sections 5.1.1, 5.2.1, 5.3.1, 5.4.1, 5.5.1, and 5.6. We did not include
DER, as we believe we should avoid indicating what is inside the
base64.
We ask that at least one author verify that base64 is acceptable before
moving forward with the publication process.
I didn't read emails in best order :-)
Marking it as base64 is acceptable, if not perfect.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
][email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
