>>>>> "Mo" == Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mo> Boy, the problems with these macros just don't stop. I have now Mo> re-discovered that when you do not include a call to AC_OBJEXT or Mo> AC_EXEEXT, automake acts differently. Right. Do not remove them until Automake is fixed. They are defined to nothing for this reason.
- AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- RE: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- RE: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
