On 14 Dec 2000, Akim Demaille wrote: > | % ./i386-mingw32msvc-gcc -o run tmp.c > > What happens if you don't -o? And are there any problems with run > instead of run.exe? Why is it wrong? Drum roll please ... % rm *.exe % ./i386-mingw32msvc-gcc tmp.c mo(~/project/install/Xmingwin/bin)% ls *.exe a.exe % rm *.exe % i586-cygwin32-gcc tmp.c % ls *.exe a.exe Mo DeJong Red Hat Inc
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Mo DeJong
- RE: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
- RE: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Earnie Boyd
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Lars J. Aas
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_CYGWIN etc. (Was: AC_OBJEXT again) Akim Demaille
