On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 11:24 +0900, Ian Kent wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 12:52 +1100, Paul Wankadia wrote: > > > > > > The only question remaining is how large should we make the > > table. > > A size of around 4k will lead to a lot of wasted space for > > many common > > configurations (including configurations that have many map > > entries > > spread over several individual maps) but a size around 1k > > still gives > > fairly long chains for large maps. > > > > Suggestions? > > > > Perhaps you could make it configurable? > > Perhaps, but I don't think this is the sort of thing that should be > configurable so I'd prefer to make it a compile time option rather than > a run time configuration setting.
I've changed my mind, ;), configurable it is with a default of 977. Ian _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs
