>> I have a bunch of patches for v4 from Jeff Moyer that I've not got >> around to looking closely at and applying. We didn't get as far as the >> negative lookup caching patch though. In fact I don't think it had been >> written then. > > Tough call on what to do here. I don't like that we have all of these > patches in RHEL only. At the same time, new distribution versions > should be using autofs5. So, I'm having a hard time justifying the work > of merging all of the work we've done in the RHEL package.
I was impressed by the amount of patches too. You are doing a great job maintaining it. > Are people still looking for new features in autofs 4? If so, why? In this specific case it's not really a new feature, because -- even if with bugs -- it was there before. _______________________________________________ autofs mailing list autofs@linux.kernel.org http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs