automake  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: What did AM_ ever do to you? Stefano Lattarini
• $(OBJEXT) equivalent for .lo files? Rhys Ulerich
  • Re: $(OBJEXT) equivalent for .lo files? Eric Blake
• Can automake move aclocal.m4 into subdirectory? Bob Rossi
  • Re: Can automake move aclocal.m4 into subdirectory? Bob Rossi
  • Re: Can automake move aclocal.m4 into subdirectory? Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: Can automake move aclocal.m4 into subdirectory? Stefano Lattarini
• Propagating $(FCLIBS) within a convenience library Rhys Ulerich
• Funding and Feature Request Management For Open Source Boian Mihailov
  • Re: Funding and Feature Request Management For Open Source Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: Funding and Feature Request Management For Open Source Andy Tai
• Create system wide config.{guess,sub} scripts Pavel Raiskup
  • Re: Create system wide config.{guess,sub} scripts Wookey
• make dist for both Debian and Fedora? Daniel Pocock
  • Re: make dist for both Debian and Fedora? Russ Allbery
  • Re: make dist for both Debian and Fedora? Dan Nicholson
• Automake should flag -l parameters in LDFLAGS Jan Engelhardt
• Re: Autoreconf stops with "non-POSIX variable name" Eric Blake
  • RE: Autoreconf stops with "non-POSIX variable name" Borchert, Oliver
  • Re: Autoreconf stops with "non-POSIX variable name" Eric Blake
  • Re: Autoreconf stops with "non-POSIX variable name" Russ Allbery
• Non-recursive automake and double-colon rules Roger Leigh
  • Re: Non-recursive automake and double-colon rules Nick Bowler
• Bison/YACC suffix bug Michael Blumenkrantz
• custom silent rule not working in MSYS Vincent Torri
  • Re: custom silent rule not working in MSYS NightStrike
• make distcheck fails when modules not installed Nate Bargmann
  • Re: make distcheck fails when modules not installed NightStrike
  • Re: make distcheck fails when modules not installed Nate Bargmann
• automake's Per-Object Flags Emulation --- CFLAGS override or just prepend ? Michele Martone
  • Re: automake's Per-Object Flags Emulation --- CFLAGS override or just prepend ? Michele Martone
  • Re: automake's Per-Object Flags Emulation --- CFLAGS override or just prepend ? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: automake's Per-Object Flags Emulation --- CFLAGS override or just prepend ? Michele Martone
  • Re: automake's Per-Object Flags Emulation --- CFLAGS override or just prepend ? Stefano Lattarini
• distclean should walk subdirs in reverse order Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: distclean should walk subdirs in reverse order Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: distclean should walk subdirs in reverse order Harlan Stenn
  • Re: distclean should walk subdirs in reverse order Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: distclean should walk subdirs in reverse order Harlan Stenn
  • Re: distclean should walk subdirs in reverse order Bob Friesenhahn
• bug#13514: [PATCH v3 1/2] aclocal: just warn if the primary local m4 dir doesn't exist (don't error) Stefano Lattarini
• bug#13760: [PATCH 0/2] am__make_dryrun fails to handle GNU make -I option Boris Kolpackov
• Configure should failed in case format ustar and big UID are used Petr Hracek
  • Re: Configure should failed in case format ustar and big UID are used Stefano Lattarini
• bug#13761: FAIL: t/objc-megademo.sh (OS X 10.6) Stefano Lattarini
• Parallel tests Simon Richter
  • Re: Parallel tests Stefano Lattarini
• bug#13748: Numerous failures/errors Andrew Brager
• Autogen error Olmide
  • Re: Autogen error Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Autogen.sh error Bruce Korb
  • Re: Autogen.sh error Olmide
  • Re: Autogen.sh error Stefano Lattarini
• non recursive make and BUILT_SOURCES: circular dependency error Vincent Torri
• subdir-objects and generated file names Vincent Torri
  • Re: subdir-objects and generated file names Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: subdir-objects and generated file names Stefano Lattarini
• bug#13514: [PATCH v2 0/0] AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR && non-existent directory Pavel Raiskup
• on naming test files for parallel test harness and not removing extensions Marco Maggi
  • Re: on naming test files for parallel test harness and not removing extensions Stefano Lattarini
• Inconsistencies in boolean parameters Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: Inconsistencies in boolean parameters Stefano Lattarini
  • AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE immanuel litzroth
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Russ Allbery
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Ineiev
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Russ Allbery
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Bob Proulx
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Russ Allbery
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Bob Proulx
  • Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE immanuel litzroth
• bug#11419: Get rid of ylwrap, and simplify yacc/lex rules: withdrawn this wishlist entry Akim Demaille
• Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Peter Rosin
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Russ Allbery
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Peter Rosin
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Eric Blake
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Peter Rosin
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [FYI] {branch-1.13.2} NEWS: we no longer plan to drop $(INCLUDES) support in next major version Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: [FYI] {branch-1.13.2} NEWS: we no longer plan to drop $(INCLUDES) support in next major version Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Akim Demaille
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS Eric Blake
  • Re: Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS NightStrike
• warning with help/Makefile Rudra Banerjee
  • Re: warning with help/Makefile Nick Bowler
• [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Jack Kelly
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Peter Johansson
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Dave Goodell
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Daniel Herring
  • bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Eric Dorland
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Jack Kelly
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Jack Kelly
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Daniel Herring
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Diego Elio Pettenò
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Vincent Torri
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Nate Bargmann
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • [IMPORTANT] *Implemented* a new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Stefano Lattarini
  • [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Thien-Thi Nguyen
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Nate Bargmann
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Russ Allbery
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Peter Rosin
  • Re: bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Miles Bader
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues Miles Bader
  • Re: bug#13578: Status: A new versioning scheme for automake releases, and a new branching scheme for the Git repository Mathieu Lirzin
• Pax hangs in case big UID Petr Hracek
• tasklist item still relevant? toby cabot
  • Re: tasklist item still relevant? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: tasklist item still relevant? toby cabot
• Automake test release 1.13.1b (will become 1.13.2) Stefano Lattarini
• combined report for make check? Karl Berry
  • Re: combined report for make check? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: combined report for make check? Karl Berry
  • Re: combined report for make check? Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: combined report for make check? Karl Berry
  • Re: combined report for make check? Miles Bader
  • Improving user experience for non-recursive builds Stefano Lattarini
• Using AM_CONDITIONAL in m4 macros Philipp Thomas
  • Re: Using AM_CONDITIONAL in m4 macros Nick Bowler
  • Re: Using AM_CONDITIONAL in m4 macros Philipp Thomas
  • Re: Using AM_CONDITIONAL in m4 macros Stefano Lattarini
• serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Brandon Black
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Brandon Black
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Brandon Black
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Stefano Lattarini
  • [PATCH] docs: parallel-tests is no longer experimental (was: Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility) Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Milan Broz
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Russ Allbery
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Luke Mewburn
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Stefano Lattarini
  • Re: serial-tests option and backwards compatibility Peter Johansson

• Earlier messages
• Later messages