Hi Greg, On Sat, 14 Sep 2002 10:16, Greg Steuck wrote: > I am going to use TLSSocketFactory in my application and I would like > to discuss some changes I am about to make and see how folks feel > about them.
great. > First, I am going to improve the javadocs: > * move the configuration description to the top of the class > (and replace those nasty <> with char entities) yay! > * specify the defaults for the configuration keys yay! > * maybe produce a schema file for the configuration (low priority > for me plus I don't know xml schema syntax) yay! yay! > Then, I don't see how authenticate-client is applicable to the > _client_ connections this factory produces. So I propose to remove > this notion altogether from the class. hmm .. not sure either ... I vaguely remember there was a reason for this but it seems fairly silly now ... ANy one else got any ideas? > Finally, TLSSocketFactory has 3 public overloaded createSocket methods > allowing one to wrap an existing socket into SSL. The problem with > that is that these methods are not part of SocketFactory service. The > methods themselves are genuinely useful, so I propose an extension of > SocketFactory that specifies them and then we can have > TLSSocketFactory provide both services. works for me. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ---------------------------------------- Why does everyone always overgeneralize? ---------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
