> The
> vast majority of "GPL" java projects out there violate the GPL, the FSF is
> quite aware of this and choose to ignore it (RMS called java a blight on
> the free software wordl)
I assume this is because of the way Java more or less links in with the
software, so it is considered part of the code? Licenses are so confusing...
urggg! If this is the case then, I would also assume that the vast majority
of applications that use GPL are in violation too. I know there are allot of
developers taking GPL code and using it in a prosperity software built for a
client. Does this not violate the GPL? even maybe the LGPL?
-david
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
