Peter Donald wrote:
>
> The arguements against this are generally;
> * This means you can not download a single repository, cd into dir and
> build automatically. You have to download them all. I don't see this as
an
> issue now (it may become an issue when phoenix enters beta state though).
> When/if it becomes an issue we can simply update relevent project to
store
> binaries in CVS again
Why do people need to download everything? If you upload released
configurations, and I upload daily configurations, people can pick one of
the two to use as a startiing point. Then (assuming that interfaces are
relatively stable), people can checkout the repositories that they care
about and, in the process of building, effectively update their baseline
accordingly.
> * building against latest of everything (and thus not stable). This
> shouldn't be an issue as framework+logkit is mostly stable now and
> hopefully excalibur will be soon. (Besides we have gump to warn us of
> issues ;]).
What amuses me is that this wasn't a concern when avalon was in one cvs,
but is now one when the exact same code is spread across multiple cvs'es.
- Sam Ruby
P.S. +1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
