On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 02:35, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In ExtendedPatternFormatter.getTypeIdFor(), a "super." is missing for
> actually calling the superclass method.
fixed.
> BTW, why don't you merge ExtendedPatternFormatter in PatternFormatter ?
It was a safety thing ... ie I know everything in PatternFormatter is used
and are willing to support it. Not so sure about ExtendedPF but will probably
merge EPF into PF before next release - not sure ;)
--
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
* "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, *
* and proving that there is no need to do so - almost *
* everyone gets busy on the proof." *
* - John Kenneth Galbraith *
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
