On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Paul Hammant wrote:
> True, but other teams could <b>decide</b> that Avalon is good enough to
> be a foundation at some point.
I thing letting them know that Avalon is ready for prime time would be
needed.
Besides, duplication makes newbies having a hard time (ie: deciding which
one to use). Eg: Excalibur has db pooling, so does Turbine.
>I think it all starts with Tomcat. If
> we ported a simple HTTP server (resurrect PicoServer) to Avalon, then
> the Tomcat team might like what they see and make plans themselves.
It seems that the World needs a "Kitten" web server. Sure, Tomcat would
fulfill all your web server feature needs, but I believe that there are
people who'd like to have something more lighter. Say, in Java
Programming 101 course, students can implement a db based security module
for the lightweight web server.
Oki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
