> >>3) rename from "plain" FtpServer to AptSnarf (anagram of "Rana's
> >>FTP") as Apache does not do plain
> >>names.
> >>
> >
> >My choice would be simply "Avalon FTP Server" as it is quite clear
> >and correct a description and solidifies the avalon brand name.
> >
> This seems to be a common objection, and "Avalon FTP Server" has some
> simplicity to it. What package name? aftps?
works for me...
> >On another subject, this is the third app we're putting
> >in cornerstone that is not really a cornerstone. Time to
> >vote on an jakart-avalon-applications cvs, perhaps?
> >(containing the FTP Server, the proxy server (which is
> >called HTTP Proxy) and XCommander (which perhaps should
> >be called Avalan XML Socket Server)).
>
> Well, HTTPProxy is quite lightweight on features, and though there could
> be more, is definately only a demo at the moment. XCommander is quite
> descriptive - I thought, but yes, a move to apps/ would be good.
XCommander was a programming exercise where I had a valid use case
("a generic framework to ease the development of XML Socket Programs
communicating with the Flash 5 plugin") and it ended up being more
useful than most existing products (at that time, dev in this area
is fast).
Since most people use it not as an example/demo but as an app, it
should probably be branded as such.>
> All of these apps should generate different SAR files - yes? Whereas
> the demos and cornerstone fundamentals could share one...
yup. Are we all in agreement?
grz,
- Leo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
