On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:01, Paul Hammant wrote:
> WRT http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/
>
> I propose that we change the text in the logo from "Apache Server
> Framework" to "Apache Server Project"
> Why? The word framework is already used in the context of Avalon.
>
> Votes?
+-0, leaning toward -1. Motivation: Apache Server Project is almost already taken by
+the HTTP server, which is listed under Projects: HTTP Server. Calling something else
+Apache Server Project may lead to confusion since most people, I think, would equate
+"Apache" with the HTTP Server project.
"Apache Server Framework" is fine, because that's what Avalon is. What we do need is,
as Leo Simons said, a better description of just what Avalon is. I remember being
utterly confused when I first looked at it, and the only reason I decided to adopt it
was because I figured the Role -> Component mapping would be useful, and the only
reason I knew about that was that I had seen it in Cocoon. I never expected to go
beyond that.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
