Leo, See my reply to Jeff, five min before you posting.. It clarifies my feeling towards the word "framework" and its existence in the logo on the *root* Avalon page.
- Paul > >On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:01, Paul Hammant wrote: > >>WRT http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/ >> >>I propose that we change the text in the logo from "Apache Server >>Framework" to "Apache Server Project" >>Why? The word framework is already used in the context of Avalon. >> >>Votes? >> > >+-0, leaning toward -1. Motivation: Apache Server Project is almost already taken by >the HTTP server, which is listed under Projects: HTTP Server. Calling something else >Apache Server Project may lead to confusion since most people, I think, would equate >"Apache" with the HTTP Server project. > >"Apache Server Framework" is fine, because that's what Avalon is. What we do need is, >as Leo Simons said, a better description of just what Avalon is. I remember being >utterly confused when I first looked at it, and the only reason I decided to adopt it >was because I figured the Role -> Component mapping would be useful, and the only >reason I knew about that was that I had seen it in Cocoon. I never expected to go >beyond that. > >/LS > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
