> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Abstract names are good if they are few, because our minds can > handle that. However, I personally start losing track after about > a dozen. Exactly. And we can not use up all of that dozen in Excalibur. A coder using Excalibur will have Excalibur names, plus many more abstract names to keep track of. Plus, that is a dozen *if you get some time to learn them*. Consider the maintenance programmer trying to make sense of it all. /LS -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] ... Peter Royal
- RE: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] ... Leo Sutic
- Re: excalibur package naming (RE: [V... Pete Carapetyan
- Re: excalibur package naming (RE... Paul Hammant
- RE: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] Shou... Berin Loritsch
- RE: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] ... Leo Sutic
- Re: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] ... Peter Donald
- Re: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] Shou... Peter Donald
- community as opposed to company (RE: exca... Leo Simons
- RE: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] Should C... Berin Loritsch
- Re: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] Shou... Leo Sutic
- Re: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] Shou... Peter Donald
- RE: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] Should Command be... Leo Simons
- RE: excalibur package naming (RE: [VOTE] Should Comma... Leo Sutic
- RE: excalibur package naming Leo Simons
- RE: excalibur package naming Leo Sutic
- RE: excalibur package naming Leo Simons
