> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> We seem to be in agreement that ComponentManager is not the
> correct name for what we are trying to enforce with the CM.
> Therefore I suggest we vote on the name--that way when we
> refer to it in our emails we can refer to the new name and
> avoid confusion over which version CM we are talking about
> (esp. for lurkers).
>
> So far we have two candidates that have popped up in the past mails:
>
> * ComponentDirectory
> * ComponentLocator
+1 for ComponentLocator, as it gives pleasant J2EE associations
to the "Service Locator" pattern:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/patterns/
J2EEPatternsRelationships.html
I would be +1 for ServiceLocator, but we are talking Components and
not Services.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
