> I like the quote from Stephen Haberman:
> 
> "I agree; I'm very new to Avalon, but given my na�ve
>  impression of what the component is supposed to do,
>  I like XXXLocator better also. As a newbie, I can
>  understand the concept quicker than with the
>  XXXDirectory."

This is very important (I will know its meaning anyway =). I'd like to
get input from other users.

> That would make (on official voting):
> 
> ServiceLocator (XXXXLocator): 3 (Me, Leo Sutic, Stephen McConnel)
> ComponentDirectory: 2 (Leo Simmons, MarcusCrafter)

I'm okay with ComponentXXXX (within some limits). I don't think it is
smart to start using the word "service"...it might look good in
management meetings ("so, does it support Web Services?"), but it is
blurry.

I'll even give you a -1 on that if neccessary :P. We do COP here, not
SOP. Or are we changing that too?

- Leo



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to