Berin Loritsch wrote:
> The configuration package is pretty good, however we should include the
> same
> disclaimer text as mentioned in the thread on Parameterizable.

*if* we put it there (still against it)

> Also we should add a branch(Configuration config, String newRootName) to
> the ConfigurationUtil class....

?

BTW, there is a commons-configuration going on.
How should we cope with that?

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to