Peter Donald wrote:
> At 08:50 AM 6/16/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>
>
>> Peter Donald wrote:
>>
>>> At 11:20 AM 6/15/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> The configuration package is pretty good, however we should include
>>>> the
>>>> same
>>>> disclaimer text as mentioned in the thread on Parameterizable.
>>>>
>>>> Also we should add a branch(Configuration config, String
>>>> newRootName) to
>>>> the ConfigurationUtil class....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would actually prefer to make Configuration a concrete
>>> implementation if at all possible because I have never seen an
>>> alternative implementation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ummm,
>>
>> .... and what would you class
>> org.apache.excalibur.configuration.CascadingConfiguration as ?
>>
>> :-)
>
>
>
> You probably would not appreciate what I would call it ;)
Ummm, let me think - *clever*, *useful*, *flexible*, ...
:-)
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
