Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> I'm not interested in general architecture discussion but I am
> interested in
> reusable components. A Jakarta Architecture Labs may be fun, I probably
> would not subscribe to the list and I certainly would not call it Avalon.
I totally agree.
Cocoon is a product. It is quite stable. How does it evolve with new stuff?
Scratchpad.
If we just put elucubrations and new stuff in the scratchpad, it will be
ok, as it has ever been.
But a project cannot be just scratchpad stuff. If the architectire of a
project changes every version, it's not a project, but a playground.
And it might as well mean that the previous thing sucked.
We make a component framework, and since it's Apache, it's implemented
as a server framework.
Opensource is about small but steady steps forward, incremental changes.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
