Paulo Gaspar wrote: >Avalon 4 is so simple and small that it was very easy for me >rewrite parts and abuse it quite a bit for my own ends. And I >also find it extremely simple, so simple that I do not >understand how Pete can still insist on the KISS principle. > I quite agree, my good sir. Simple it is.
My selfish lobbying is not to make the usage simpler, but that your abuse of it, and my abuse of it, may be exactly the same. Not sure how I got KISS out of that, and I am very willing to model my abuse after your abuse, or anyone elses for that matter. Long as it works. But when both of us abuse it in exactly the same way, then we can share components with maximum ease. And that is the promise that I so selfishly lobby for. So much duplication of effort in our little world, but none of it necessary, because the code is all shared willingly. Only the lack of common interfaces prevent it, and a commonly accepted loose coupling mechanism. That is the promise of Avalon, a promise I wish to take to the code bank. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
