Peter Donald wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 07:10, Peter Royal wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 June 2002 05:09 pm, Peter Donald wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:41, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> > > > The commit message was too big, so it got rejected.
> > >
> > > You know I am going to revert this as soon as I have to edit the files.
> >
> > Out of curiosity, what's proper from a "apache foundation covering their
> > ass" standpoint?
>
> Depends on who you ask. The head of Apache said short form is fine, another
> apache board member saids it is evil. Both have consulted lawyers so take
> your pick ;)
The ASF member list with the Apache licensing commitee came up with an
informal resolution that *strongly* suggests to use the full version
until the Apache License 2.0 is ready. The new license is legally
designed to allow boilerplating.
So, please, until the new license is out, let's use the full license
even if it's longer. Thanks.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
