> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Peter Donald wrote: > > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 07:10, Peter Royal wrote: > > > On Tuesday 25 June 2002 05:09 pm, Peter Donald wrote: > > > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:41, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > > > > The commit message was too big, so it got rejected. > > > > > > > > You know I am going to revert this as soon as I have to > edit the > > > > files. > > > > > > Out of curiosity, what's proper from a "apache foundation > covering > > > their ass" standpoint? > > > > Depends on who you ask. The head of Apache said short form is fine, > > another apache board member saids it is evil. Both have consulted > > lawyers so take your pick ;) > > The ASF member list with the Apache licensing commitee came > up with an informal resolution that *strongly* suggests to > use the full version until the Apache License 2.0 is ready. > The new license is legally designed to allow boilerplating. > > So, please, until the new license is out, let's use the full > license even if it's longer. Thanks.
It appears Peter already reverted the change :( I don't want to get into a pissing contest with him over this issue, so I will let someone else try and convert him. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
