Paulo Gaspar wrote: >I follow the Anti-Pattern thing since 4 years ago. I like it. It >is a great argument. > >What I disagree is about making the central/introductory argument >for Avalon. > >First show how it is great, THEN show how it avoids bad things. > Makes the assumption that the person being showed has the same sense of what is great that you or I do.
My sense of the market is that without anti-patterns, the great features of Avalon resonate like a good yawn to the typical developer. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Can you offer any observations that show developers who even give Avalon a second click, without a sense of the anti-patterns already deep in their bones? The best use of an anti-pattern as a communication device that I have seen is a crack that my nephew was walking around with a couple years ago. *New breakthroughs in toilet paper technology.* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
