Marcus Crafter wrote:
>Hi Stephen,
>
> Sorry, I'm coming into the thread a little late - I'll have a look at
> what you've done in Merlin below and send in some comments soon.
>
>
Great!
I'm looking forward to ticking that one off the list,
> Are you in the process of splitting up the jar files now ?
>
If you happy with the org.apache.ezcalibur.container.lifecycle stuff
(inside the excalibur/assembly CVS), I'll package it up into a seperate
jar file ASAP.
>
> Assuming the extension models are now consolidated - the next thing in
> the lifecycle extension world to look at was the session proposal
> from Berin, archived under
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=102742811501755&w=2.
>
> Have you investigated this one already ?
>
>
Nope - I actually want to finalize the lifestyle content first (any help
from Fortress people appraciated). Basically singleton and transient
are in place. Getting in mpool based pooled policy and per-thread would
wrap that item up nicely. Fro there I would like to do a review of the
meta model package - make sure all the doc is ok, check consistency in
method naming, class naming etc. then push this into a seperate project.
After that, update Merlin 2.0 to use the "common" meta-model and get an
alpha release out the door.
Cheers, Steve.
> Cheers,
>
> Marcus
>
>On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 01:00:48PM +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>>OK
>>>
>>>After seperation of profile deployment from instance instantiation I can
>>>now provide context to all stages.
>>>
>>>I'll go ahead and update Merlin's extension framework to the following:
>>>
>>> interface Creator
>>> {
>>> void create( Object object, Context context ) throws Exception;
>>> void destroy( Object object, Context context );
>>> }
>>>
>>> interface Accessor
>>> {
>>> void access( Object object, Context context ) throws Exception;
>>> void release( Object object, Context context );
>>> }
>>>
>>>Cheers, Steve.
>>>
>>>
>>DONE.
>>
>>Merlin now provides full support for lifestyle extension based on the
>>above interfaces. I've include the Creator and Accessor interfaces and
>>container independent abstract classes in the package
>>org.apache.excalibur.container.lifecycle.* For the moment these are
>>included in the merlin jar file but I'll come up with a seperate
>>excalibur-container jar in the near future that can be used indepedently
>>of Merlin.
>>
>>Cheers, Steve.
>>
>>--
>>
>>Stephen J. McConnell
>>
>>OSM SARL
>>digital products for a global economy
>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>http://www.osm.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
