> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Marcus Crafter wrote: > > >Hi Stephen, > > > > Sorry, I'm coming into the thread a little late - I'll > have a look at > > what you've done in Merlin below and send in some comments soon. > > > > > > Great! > I'm looking forward to ticking that one off the list,
Me too! > > Are you in the process of splitting up the jar files now ? > > > > If you happy with the org.apache.ezcalibur.container.lifecycle stuff > (inside the excalibur/assembly CVS), I'll package it up into > a seperate > jar file ASAP. I am happy with it. > > Assuming the extension models are now consolidated - > the next thing in > > the lifecycle extension world to look at was the > session proposal > > from Berin, archived under > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=avalon-dev&m=102742811501755&w=2. > > > > Have you investigated this one already ? > > > > > > Nope - I actually want to finalize the lifestyle content > first (any help > from Fortress people appraciated). That's cool. I want a common model as well. > Basically singleton and transient > are in place. Getting in mpool based pooled policy and > per-thread would > wrap that item up nicely. Fro there I would like to do a > review of the > meta model package - make sure all the doc is ok, check > consistency in > method naming, class naming etc. then push this into a > seperate project. > After that, update Merlin 2.0 to use the "common" meta-model > and get an > alpha release out the door. What help do you need? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
