Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
...
> The issue being that things like POI and the aforementioned system are
> primitives in a larger application. They do not need to directly depend
> on the compoents etc. You can utilize the bridge pattern and stay
> effectively component and/or service based. It is not necessary for
> every dang API out there to support every avalon interface. I don't
> think it serves Avalon or the projects that use it. I've been watching
> this for awhile and have remained silent.
This is what we are all saying.
You got it ;-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
