RE: [FOP Avalonization] IoC the holy grail?

[Leo Sutic]

> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> 
> For what its worth - I think Andrew's opinions are completely 
> appropriate for this list.
>
>    ...
>
> the subject is dealing with Avalon boundaries and that is 
> completely relevant to this list.

Agreed.

And my $2M (adjusted for inflation): 

As one who has seen FOP from the inside, I'd go for a more 
componentized model - but keep all interfaces etc. within FOP - 
don't add a dependency on Avalon/Framework. That'd give you the 
advantages of a componentized model but without the extra 
baggage of dependencies.

/LS


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>