Peter, >>I don't get it. You use words, but then when someone wants to provide an >>explanation of the words (or asks you to do so), you think the words are >>too 'generic' or 'vague' to be explanatory....which means your use of >>the words would also be too 'generic' and 'vague'. >> >> > >No - the usage of words is context sensitive. The more generic a word, the >more context sensitive usages it will have. Thats why I suggested that we >adopt non-generic words and apply specific definitions to them (as that way >we could definitions in the context of Avalon discussions). However no one >seemed to want that ;) > That is not true, there are many that would like to see a concise set of well defined and carefully used terms. I happen to be against the use of new terms, but for the use of concise ones.
- Paul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
