Ho ho. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is me ;). Although the project I was working on is still halted until I get around to setting up a JMS service in Phoenix. Otherwise Avalon seems to work -- provided, that is, that you're willing to go through stuff only available in CVS to figure out how to use it.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Avalon Developer's List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: Opinions from JUnit mailling list on Avalon > > From the thread entitled: > "[junit] Unit testing multithreaded network code" > > (which by the way is an interesting read for testing networking code) > > Had the opinions posted from two developers: > > "The general issue of how to approach this sort of issue remains > unsolved, but I sidestepped my own problem by passing the > responsibilty of verifying the robustness of code to the Jakarta > Avalon project. I may be taking the lazy way out, but I trust the > Apache people to write working software." > > From: weitzman_d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > The response was: > > "This might be a deceiving attitude at best. The Avalon project has a > high > code quality indeed, but as for Jakarta projects in general this does > not hold. > Just look randomly around and you'll find lots and lots and lots of > really > bad code with zero tests with no regard to object-oriented principles > and > which violates almost any heuristics for good code I know of." > > From: Johannes Link [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I think we have a reputation for quality--which I would like to see > continue. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
