Second thought, it's hard to change cause it would break backward
compatibility ...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 09:46
> To: 'Avalon Developers List'
> Subject: RE: DataSourceComponent extending Configurable
>
>
> You mean the interface extends Configurable?
>
> That is a bug.  I can't believe I put code in there like
> that!  Unless another well meaning person did it....
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vincent Tence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 5:43 PM
> > To: 'Avalon Developers List'
> > Subject: DataSourceComponent extending Configurable
> >
> >
> > Hi Berin,
> >
> > Any special reason why DataSourceComponent extends
> > Configurable - rather than JdbcDataSource implementing
> > Configurable? I came accross that when implementing a
> > mockobject DataSourceComponent.
> >
> > Vincent
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 16:59
> > > To: 'Avalon Developers List'
> > > Subject: RE: Opinions from JUnit mailling list on Avalon
> > >
> > >
> > > > From: David W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >
> > > > Ho ho.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is me ;).  Although the
> > project I was
> > > > working on is still halted until I get around to
> setting up a JMS
> > > > service in Phoenix.  Otherwise Avalon seems to work --
> provided,
> > > > that is, that you're willing to go through stuff only
> > available in
> > > > CVS to figure out how to use it.
> > >
> > > Well, if you have some sort of time compression device
> > where I would
> > > be able to put 16 hours of work into an 8 hour period, I
> > would be more
> > > than happy to resolve these issues.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "'Avalon Developer's List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:33 AM
> > > > Subject: Opinions from JUnit mailling list on Avalon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From the thread entitled:
> > > > > "[junit] Unit testing multithreaded network code"
> > > > >
> > > > > (which by the way is an interesting read for testing
> > > > networking code)
> > > > >
> > > > > Had the opinions posted from two developers:
> > > > >
> > > > > "The general issue of how to approach this sort of
> > issue remains
> > > > > unsolved, but I sidestepped my own problem by passing the
> > > > > responsibilty of verifying the robustness of code to
> the Jakarta
> > > > > Avalon project.   I may be taking the lazy way out, but I
> > > trust the
> > > > > Apache people to write working software."
> > > > >
> > > > >                  From: weitzman_d
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > >
> > > > > The response was:
> > > > >
> > > > > "This might be a deceiving attitude at best. The Avalon
> > > > project has a
> > > > > high code quality indeed, but as for Jakarta projects in
> > > > general this
> > > > > does not hold.
> > > > > Just look randomly around and you'll find lots and lots
> > > and lots of
> > > > > really
> > > > > bad code with zero tests with no regard to object-oriented
> > > > principles
> > > > > and
> > > > > which violates almost any heuristics for good code I know of."
> > > > >
> > > > >                  From: Johannes Link
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think we have a reputation for quality--which I would
> > like to see
> > > > continue.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For
> > > additional commands,
> > > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> --
> To
> unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For
> additional commands,
> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to