Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
>
> Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
>> The link on the web site:
>>
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/excalibur/container/attributes.html
>>
>> avalon:name java.lang.String The name of a component (is this
>> really necessary?)
>
>
>
> It not "necessary" but it is convinient for two reasons. Firstly it
> provides a hook to the component instance name assigned by a container
> when having to deal with things like BlockContext. Secondly, it is
> useful in error message generation by a component implementation.
Just keep in mind that under your proposal, a Component can go by many
names. I have to assume that you are refering to the assembly.xml
declared name as opposed to the lookup role name.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>