Stephen McConnell wrote:
> 
> 
> Berin Loritsch wrote:
> 
>> The link on the web site:
>>
>> http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon/excalibur/container/attributes.html
>>
>> avalon:name   java.lang.String   The name of a component (is this
>>                                  really necessary?)
> 
> 
> 
> It not "necessary" but it is convinient for two reasons.  Firstly it 
> provides a hook to the component instance name assigned by a container 
> when having to deal with things like BlockContext.  Secondly, it is 
> useful in error message generation by a component implementation.

Just keep in mind that under your proposal, a Component can go by many
names.  I have to assume that you are refering to the assembly.xml 
declared name as opposed to the lookup role name.

-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                 - Benjamin Franklin


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to