On Wed, 2002-09-18 at 15:19, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 23:07, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> >>avalon:name   java.lang.String   The name of a component (is this
> >>                                  really necessary?)
> > 
> > 
> > +1. Seems useful to me (wrt logging, GUIs, etc). Regardless, I doubt
> > anyone would ever want to attach a different class or meaning to
> > "avalon:name" so I doubt it will lead to problems.
> 
> Well, with logging the category can be assigned to the "avalon:name",
> and management GUIs would have another way to access that information.
> So my point is why would we need it to solve real problems?

that doesn't compute....could you elaborate a bit...it seems to me if
you want to assign the category to avalon:name, you should define
avalon:name....?

- Leo



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to