Leo Sutic wrote:
Leo:
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:mcconnell@;apache.org]
Leo Simons wrote:
It's all rather icky.+1
options to make it less icky:
- jakarta PMC votes on releases (not really a practical option)
- avalon gets a board-installed PMC which votes on releases
- destroy avalon (rather not)
This sounds like a rather good argument for an avalon PMC.
+1 from me, too. It would seem to be our only viable option except for pre-emptively countersuing Microsoft, Apache and our users. However: Let's not rush this. This is a very general problem for all of Apache. There should be some guidelines from Apache on what a project should do in order to be legally solid. I've run around on the apache.org website, but not found anything. Anyone?
The following message from Stefano to the Cocoon community is worth reading. The subject concerns the Cocoon as a top level PMC.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=103599230901129&w=2
Cheers, Steve.
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
-- Stephen J. McConnell OSM SARL digital products for a global economy mailto:mcconnell@;osm.net http://www.osm.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
