Leo Sutic wrote:
Peter Donald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When this was discussed last time there was points that were raised that need
> to be addressed before any such proposal goes forward. It would be unlikely
> that these issues could be resolved in the timeframe proposed. Especially
> given that some of the interested parties may not read their mail before the
> vote is closed. As it is a major change I don't think it is appropriate to
> try and rush through anything without everyones involvement.
>
> I expect to see at least half of our code migrate to Apache Commons. Of the
> remainder I expect to see a large proportion move to incubator (or some to
> Apache Commons sandbox if it exists and some to incubator). Hopefully this
> will see a return to access based on merit and thus remove the source of
> conflict by resticting access appropriately.
>
> At that stage it may be more appropriate to migrate to a top level project.
I disagree. Two reasons:
1) When deciding what to move to commons / incubator we must have a
clear picture of what Avalon should be. That requires some form of leadership
and I believe a PMC will give us that. (By formalizing the decision process and
making it impossible for the small non-communicating fiefdoms we have now
to exist.)
2) If we have to wait until code migration stops before setting up a PMC it
will take forever. I say we get this PMC set up and start cleaning up
Avalon.
And, sign me up for that PMC list, Stephen.
With pleasure! The proposed PMC member list now includes: * Nicola Ken Barozzi * Stephen McConnell * Leo Sutic Cheers, Steve. -- Stephen J. McConnell OSM SARL digital products for a global economy mailto:mcconnell@;osm.net http://www.osm.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
